Archívum

A(z) ‘blog’ kategória archívuma

Közgyűlés 28-án

május 13th, 2010 Comments off

A Közgyűlés helye: Budapest, XIII. ker. Váci út 33., 8. emelet,
Térkép: http://link.nyissz.hu/otpalap

A Közgyűlés időpontja: 2010. május 28-án, pénteken, reggel 7:55-9:15-ig

Napirendje:
1. Beszámoló elfogadás
2. Költségvetés elfogadás
3. Stratégia elfogadás
4. Költségvetési tervezet elfogadás
5. Tisztségviselő választás
6. Alapszabály módosítás
7. Egyebek

Kérjük a tagdíjakat átutalni a 11713184-20000088-00000000 (OTP Bank)
számlaszámra a Nyílt Szabvány Szövetség részére
(megjegyzés rovatba: 2010 évi tagdíj)

Összeg: temészetes személyeknek 12.750 Ft,
Tagdíjnyilvántartás: http://link.nyissz.hu/tagdij

A közgyűlés határozatképes, ha azon a Szövetség szavazati joggal
rendelkező tagjainak több, mint fele (legalább 50 %-a + 1 tag) -
természetes személyek személyesen, a nem természetes személyek
képviselőik útján – jelen van (illetőleg szabályszerű meghatalmazással
képviselve van).
A közgyűlés határozatképtelensége esetén, a megismételt közgyűlés
megtartására 2010. május 28-án, pénteken, 8:00 órakor kerül sor azonos
napirenddel, az eredeti közgyűlés helyszínén. A Szövetség
Alapszabályának 7.4 pontja szerint a megismételt közgyűlés az előző
közgyűlés napirendjét illető kérdésekben (vagyis a jelen meghívóban
feltüntetett napirendi pontokban) – a jelen levő vagy képviselt tagok
és szavazataik számától függetlenül – határozatképesnek tekintendő.

A visszajelzéseket a hamecz pont istvan at nyissz.hu,
cc mazsa pont peter at nyissz.hu címre küldjék.

Budapest, 2010. május 13.

Tisztelettel:

Hamecz István
Elnök

Categories: blog Tags:

április 21st, 2010 Comments off
Categories: blog, blog @en Tags:

Elnökségi és FB ülés

március 24th, 2010 Comments off

Tisztelt Elnökségi / Felügyelő Bizottsági tag!

A kéthavonta rendszeresen, a páratlan hónapok negyedik péntekén
(2010ben a továbbiakban március 26, május 28, szeptember 24 és november 26)
megrendezése kerülő Elnökségi ülések
közül a következő Elnökségi ülést

2010. március 26-án pénteken reggel 7:55-re hívom össze,

az IBM székházába
Cím: Budapest, XI. kerület Neumann János utca 1., Paál Péter irodája
Térkép: http://j.mp/ibmhu

Napirend:
1. Személyi ügyek
2. Projektek
3. Elmaradt és egyéb ügyek

Az Elnökségi üléssel egyidőben és egy helyre Felügyelő Bizottsági
ülést is összehívok.

Kérem, jelenlétével tisztelje meg az ülést.

Részvételi szándékát a mazsa dot peter at nyissz.hu és a
hamecz dot istvan at nyissz.hu címen jelezze.

Tisztelettel:

Hamecz István
Elnök

Categories: blog Tags:

European Parliament resolution on the transparency and state of play of the ACTA negotiations

március 12th, 2010 Comments off

[663 in favour and 13 against]

“The European Parliament,

[...]

1. Points out that since 1 December 2009 the Commission has had a legal obligation to inform Parliament immediately and fully at all stages of international negotiations;

2. Expresses its concern over the lack of a transparent process in the conduct of the ACTA negotiations, a state of affairs at odds with the letter and spirit of the TFEU; is deeply concerned that no legal base was established before the start of the ACTA negotiations and that parliamentary approval for the negotiating mandate was not sought;

3. Calls on the Commission and the Council to grant public and parliamentary access to ACTA negotiation texts and summaries, in accordance with the Treaty and with Regulation 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;

4. Calls on the Commission and the Council to engage proactively with ACTA negotiation partners to rule out any further negotiations which are confidential as a matter of course and to inform Parliament fully and in a timely manner about its initiatives in this regard; expects the Commission to make proposals prior to the next negotiation round in New Zealand in April 2010, to demand that the issue of transparency is put on the agenda of that meeting and to refer the outcome of the negotiation round to Parliament immediately following its conclusion;

5. Stresses that, unless Parliament is immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, it reserves its right to take suitable action, including bringing a case before the Court of Justice in order to safeguard its prerogatives;

6. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of the implementation of ACTA with regard to fundamental rights and data protection, ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures, and e-commerce, prior to any EU agreement on a consolidated ACTA treaty text, and to consult with Parliament in a timely manner about the results of the assessment;

7. Welcomes affirmations by the Commission that any ACTA agreement will be limited to the enforcement of existing IPRs, with no prejudice for the development of substantive IP law in the European Union;

8. Calls on the Commission to continue the negotiations on ACTA in order to improve the effectiveness of the IPR enforcement system against counterfeiting;

9. Urges the Commission to ensure that the enforcement of ACTA provisions – especially those on copyright enforcement procedures in the digital environment – are fully in line with the acquis communautaire; demands that no personal searches will be conducted at EU borders and requests full clarification of any clauses that would allow for warrantless searches and confiscation of information storage devices such as laptops, cell phones and MP3 players by border and customs authorities;

10. Considers that in order to respect fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, while fully observing the principle of subsidiarity, the proposed agreement should not make it possible for any so-called ‘three-strikes’ procedures to be imposed, in full accordance with Parliament’s decision on Article 1.1b in the (amending) Directive 2009/140/EC calling for the insertion of a new paragraph 3(a) in Article 1 of Directive 2002/21/EC on the matter of the ‘three strikes’ policy;

11. Emphasises that privacy and data protection are core values of the European Union, recognised in Article 8 ECHR and Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which must be respected in all the policies and rules adopted by the EU pursuant to Article 16 of the TFEU;

12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the states party to the ACTA negotiations.”

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=PV&reference=20100310&secondRef=ITEM-007-07&language=EN&ring=P7-RC-2010-0154

Background: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/acta-a-global-threat-to-freedoms-open-letter via http://nyissz.hu/blog/acta-a-global-threat-to-freedoms-open-letter/

Categories: blog, blog @en Tags:

A nyílt szabványos előadás a meetupon – hátha nem tudsz jönni

február 27th, 2010 Comments off
Categories: blog Tags:

Buli a többiekkel – Februári meetup

február 24th, 2010 Comments off

A februári meetupunkat február 27-én szombaton 8(!) órakor, a Newtech
Meetup-os
és a Pecha Kuchás közös születésnapon, a Merlinben (Gerlóczy utca 4.) tartjuk. Többek
között a Szövetség egyik alelnöke, Maróy Ákos (“Metaverse Exchange
Protocol – Virtuális világok áthidalása”), és én (“Nyílt szabványok
Magyarországon: hol tartunk, merre tovább, és hogyan segíthetsz?”) is
előadunk; a tavalyi tapasztalatok alapján utána nagy buli várható. A beugró 1000 ft.

Gyertek!

Categories: blog Tags:

Hogyan tovább? – Januári Nyissz-Meetup

január 26th, 2010 Comments off

Most, hogy már hatályba is lépett a törvény és híre is terjedt a világban, hogyan tovább?

Mert ne legyünk naivak: csupán egy törvénytől semmi sem lesz nyílt szabványos.

Reaktív kérdéseink: Mik a veszélyek, honnan jönnek, hol támadhatnak, és hogyan védekezhetünk ellenük?

Proaktív kérdéseink: Hogyan segíthetjük elő, hogy az állami és a gazdasági szereplőknek érdekük legyen az átállás?

Röviden: Ki mit gondol arról, hogy hol tartunk és mi a teendő?

Ezzel foglalkozik a Januári Nyissz-Meetup.

Gyertek!

Categories: blog Tags:

Hatályba lépett a törvény!

január 26th, 2010 Comments off

A hatályos törvények között megtaláltuk az E-közszolgáltatásról szóló 2009. évi LX. tv. módosított szövegét:

j.mp/torveny

A linken március 31-ig láthatók lesznek a kis sárga mutatók, hogy hol változott a szöveg.

Tényleg minden ott van, amit elfogadtak :)

Categories: blog Tags:

Elnökségi és FB ülés

január 16th, 2010 Comments off

Tisztelt Elnökségi / Felügyelő Bizottsági tag!

A kéthavonta rendszeresen, a páratlan hónapok negyedik péntekén
(2010ben január 22, március 26, május 28, szeptember 24 és november 26)
megrendezése kerülő Elnökségi ülések
közül az első Elnökségi ülést

2010. január 22-én pénteken reggel 7:55-re hívom össze,

az OTP székházába (az eddigiektől eltérően nem az OTP Alapkezelő székházába!)
Cím: Budapest, V. kerület Nádor utca 16., Braun Péter irodája
Térkép: j.mp/otpszekhaz

Napirend:
1. Fejlemények (lásd: nyissz.hu)
2. Stratégia
3. Projektek
4. Kommunikáció
5. Közgyűlés
6. Tagfelvétel
7. Egyebek

Az Elnökségi üléssel egyidőben és egy helyre Felügyelő Bizottsági ülést is összehívok.

Kérem, jelenlétével tisztelje meg az ülést.

Részvételi szándékát a mazsa dot peter at nyissz.hu és a
hamecz dot istvan at nyissz.hu címen jelezze.

Tisztelettel:

Hamecz István
Elnök

Categories: blog Tags:

10 points on the mandatory use of open standards in Hungary

december 17th, 2009 Comments off

Hungarian Parliament has made the use of open standards mandatory by law in the intercommunication between public administration offices, public utility companies, citizens and voluntarily joining private companies, conducted via the central governmental system.

This week the Hungarian Parliament amended Act LX of 2009 on electronic public services. Below is a summary in 10 points of the amendment that makes the use of open standards mandatory.

Definitions:

Central system: the ‘nervous system’ of information and communication, operated by a company appointed by the Government.

Central system users: entities using the central system on a statutory or voluntary basis, including public administration offices, public utility companies, other companies and individuals and the IT systems thereof.

Portals: The central system can be accessed via portals (interfaces).

1. The good properties of portals (interfaces), listed below, will hereafter be set out by law.

What are the benefits?

However well the properties of the portals are defined, unless they are guaranteed by law, they will fail to deliver results in the long run.

2. The portals are standard, like wall sockets

What are the benefits?

Any device using a standard plug can be connected to the electric power supply by means of a wall socket. Connecting a television set or a refrigerator to the mains does not require the expertise of an electrician. And if the refrigerator is unplugged and a television plugged in instead, the television will work, too.

Similarly, the two types of portal set out by Hungarian legislation (the administrative portal and the client portal serving individual users) will function as statutory standard ‘sockets’ in intercommunication between computers.

3. ‘Information sockets’ can be used to connect computers

What are the benefits?

We no longer need to download information concerning us ‘manually’ one by one through the information ‘sockets’; instead, we can use software to do it for us automatically. Through the sockets the central system can operate seamlessly with the other IT and communication systems.

Consequently, we do not necessarily have to use the interface of the central system; we can access information concerning us with the help of user-friendly applications.

4. The standards governing connection to the sockets are public

Anybody can set up an information socket: the specifications of the portals of the central system are public, anybody can access them free of charge.

What are the benefits?

What this means is that they do not have to be connected to the central system, but rather, anybody can set up standard sockets enabling others to connect to their system.

By means of the sockets, not only can the central system operate seamlessly with the other IT and communication systems, but also these systems with each other.

Also, it supports the development of connections vertical (between the central system and other systems) and horizontal (other systems among each other). This dilutes the centralised role of the central system.

Nevertheless, there is much yet to be done to have the specifications of sockets established in the future more by means of a public process rather than exclusively by the government.

5. Public-benefit and royalty-free sockets

The sockets can not only be known publicly, but also used royalty-free and without any other restriction. Nobody can charge fees for the use of the socket standards.

Accordingly, by means of the sockets, IT and communication systems can operate together seamlessly – technically and financially.

What are the benefits?

It is public knowledge that setting up standards and subjecting their use to the fulfilment of conditions is a big earner.

This would be an opportunity the company appointed by the Government to operate the central system could theoretically take by persuading the Government to charge fees for the use of the sockets.

However, this opportunity has been excluded by the amendment.

6. The sockets are free of charge

The law explicitly states that no fees may be charged for the use of the sockets (that is, the system interfaces of the administrative and client portals).

What are the benefits?

It creates an unambiguous situation.

7. Sockets are competition-neutral and consequently allow for real interoperability

Sockets can be used regardless of whether the IT systems of interconnecting organisations and individuals use

  • open-source software (that is, one whose code is publicly knowable and useable) or
  • closed-source software (that is, one whose code remains private property).
  • Provided they use these sockets, the IT systems of connecting organisations and individual users will be able to communicate not only with the central system, but – regardless of the operation system they use – with each other, making them interoperable.

    This contributes to real competition between open source and closed source software.

    8. The open-standard socket has been included in Hungarian legislation.

    The open-standard ‘socket’, as described above has been defined and included in Hungarian legislation under the term of ‘portal complying with the requirements of benefiting the public’.

    What are the benefits?

    It can be quoted in other contexts (e.g. in other legislation).

    9. Already it can be used to enhance, for example, the data protection and privacy of citizens

    Using the central system does not necessarily require the use of the interface of the central system: provided data protection requirements (applicable to all entities involved) are met, anybody can create user-friendly applications to enhance the flow of information between citizens and the central system.

    What are the benefits?

    For example, applications can be created to help the citizens, free of charge and in a user-friendly way, in finding out all the information and documents concerning them, held by public administration offices – as well as by public utility companies and, in general, the central system and all of its users.

    10. It can be the basis for further co-operation

    The Open Standards Alliance (http://nyissz.hu) initiating the amendment aims to promote the spread of monopoly-free markets that foster the development of interchangeable and interoperable products generated by open standards, and, consequently, broad competition markets.

    To that end, the Alliance will co-operate with the government, provided their aims coincide. In the near future,

  • it wishes to render more transparent the process of granting benefits and allowances to citizens through the existing 93 channels – for the benefit of taxpayers, beneficiaries and the government. The first step in that direction was the open-standard amendment outlined above. In an effort to keep heading in the right direction, the Alliance will initiate collaboration between representatives of local governments, public utility companies, consumer protection bodies and the government.
  • in spite of EU tendencies the Alliance seeks to make its approach – interoperability based on publicly defined open standards – the EU norm under the Hungarian presidency of the European Union in 2011. To that end, it will promote public collaboration – possibly between every interested party, civil and political organisation in the European Union.
  • Categories: blog, blog @en Tags: